Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
124
Highlights
52
Differences
6
Reactions
0
Likes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
vs
Anker 737:
124 Highlights & 52 Differences —
So, Which Power Bank Actually Works Better
Get an insightful comparison of SHARGE Shargeek 170 and Anker 737 to find the perfect power bank for your lifestyle.
From battery cell type, input port count, charging time & output port count to user experience, we laid out the pros and quirks of SHARGE Shargeek 170 vs Anker 737 in one sharp power banks breakdown.
SHARGE Shargeek 170 vs Anker 737 Power Bank: Rugged Power Meets Smart Portability
When it comes to high-capacity power banks tailored for smartphones, tablets, and laptops, the SHARGE Shargeek 170 and the Anker 737 stand out as formidable contenders. Both offer a substantial 24000mAh battery with support for versatile charging protocols, including USB Power Delivery, Quick Charge, and PPS protocols with smart auto-detection.
Both devices can fast-charge in approximately 1.5 hours and support simultaneous charging on multiple ports, backed by robust safety features like short circuit and overcharge protection. Despite these shared capabilities, their distinctions across design, performance, and functionality create unique value propositions for different user preferences.
Power and Durability With a Rugged Twist: The SHARGE Shargeek 170
The SHARGE Shargeek 170 is crafted for users seeking exceptional output power and durability. It boasts a remarkable maximum total output of 170W, exceeding the Anker 737's 140W, making it ideal for power-hungry laptops and multiple devices. Its battery chemistry is based on high-voltage Lithium-Ion cells configured in series, offering a rated capacity of 13200mAh at 22.2V, which translates efficiently into substantial energy delivery.
What truly sets the Shargeek 170 apart is its rugged design featuring IP66 waterproofing, high impact resistance, and drop protection up to 3 meters. Constructed with fire-retardant materials and reinforced ports, it's built to endure demanding environments. The device's advanced thermal management system incorporates four thermal sensors and an innovative heat spreader design with automatic overheat recovery, ensuring safe and reliable operation.
The Shargeek 170 also offers an intuitive digital display with both physical and touch controls, accompanied by LED and buzzer alerts for user feedback. Additionally, it includes a high-power 170W wall adapter and long 240cm charging cables, enhancing convenience for fast recharging and travel readiness. While its idle power consumption is slightly higher, the device compensates with a superior battery cycle life rating of 500-800 cycles, promising extended longevity.
Smart Efficiency and Compact Convenience: The Anker 737 Power Bank
On the other side, the Anker 737 shines with its smart connectivity, elegant portability, and optimized energy efficiency. Sporting a lighter (1.39 lbs) and more compact form factor, it's perfect for travelers and everyday users who prioritize convenience without sacrificing power. Anker's battery uses Lithium-Polymer cells at 3.6V, delivering a rated capacity fully matching the 24000mAh cell rating.
The Anker 737 supports an extended voltage range of 5-28V and features stable output performance with good voltage regulation. It incorporates Bluetooth connectivity and app support, enabling remote monitoring, usage analytics, and firmware updates right from your smartphone; features not found on the SHARGE model. Notifications and smart alerts actively keep users informed, while multiple support channels, including live chat and phone assistance, enhance user experience.
Despite lacking waterproof certification or rugged protection, the Anker 737 makes up for it with a sophisticated metal chassis and enhanced passive cooling with three thermal sensors. However, it requires a cooldown after overheating. It excels in environmental performance too, boasting an impressive 88% efficiency and ultra-low idle power consumption (0.1W), making it energy-smart for everyday use. Its 24-month warranty further solidifies consumer confidence.
Quick Take
The SHARGE Shargeek 170 earns big points for its higher power output, durability with IP66 waterproofing, and advanced thermal safety design; perfect for power users in rugged conditions. Meanwhile, the Anker 737 impresses with compact portability, smart Bluetooth integration, and superior energy efficiency, making it a compelling choice for connected and on-the-go lifestyles.
Bottom Line
Ultimately, the SHARGE Shargeek 170 is the top pick for power users who demand robust performance and resilience to harsh environments, supported by a quick 170W charging capability and rugged build. Conversely, the Anker 737 is better suited for those who value portability, intelligent app-controlled features, and a cost-effective, energy-efficient power bank backed by stellar warranty and support. Both deliver excellent multi-device charging versatility, but your choice hinges on the balance of ruggedness versus smart connectivity.
Verdict
Winner: SHARGE Shargeek 170; For unmatched output power, rugged durability, and superior thermal management designed to endure challenging settings.
Runner-up: Anker 737 offers smart features, a compact design, and remarkable energy efficiency with broad customer support, ideal for daily travelers and tech-savvy users.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Whether you’re upgrading or switching brands, this power banks battle of SHARGE Shargeek 170 vs Anker 737 puts the facts (and favorites) in your hands.
Defines the lowest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Minimum,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
equal
32.00 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Minimum on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
46
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Power Bank
45
Anker 737
0Votes
Power Bank
Anker 737
This product is categorized as a Power Bank, designed to provide portable power for various electronic devices.
Identifies the functional category of the portable charging device.
In the battle of Product Type,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
The power bank is intended for use cases such as Smartphone Charging, Tablet Charging, Laptop Charging, Travel Backup, and Emergency Power, offering versatile power solutions.
Describes the primary usage scenarios the power bank is designed for.
In the battle of Intended Use Case,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use Case on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Finish Type
What type of finish does it have?
56
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Glossy
45
Anker 737
0Votes
Textured
vs
Finish Type
The SHARGE Shargeek 170 features a Glossy finish, whereas the Anker 737 has a Textured finish, offering distinct tactile experiences.
Describes the surface finish of the exterior shell.
In the battle of Finish Type,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish Type on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Maximum
What is the maximum operating temperature?
104
°F
0Votes
95
°F
0Votes
vs
Operating Temperature Maximum
The SHARGE Shargeek 170 can operate in temperatures up to 104°F, slightly higher than the Anker 737's maximum operating temperature of 95°F, giving the Shargeek a wider operational range in warmer climates.
Defines the highest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Maximum,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
9.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Maximum on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Waterproof Rating
What is the waterproof rating?
80
SHARGE Shargeek 170
1Votes
IP66
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Waterproof Rating
SHARGE Shargeek 170 offers an IP66 waterproof rating, providing strong protection against water and dust, while Anker 737 does not have a specified waterproof rating, making the Shargeek more resilient in wet environments.
Shows the level of water resistance certification.
Based on community votes for Waterproof Rating,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 737 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The IP66 waterproof rating on the Shargeek 170 is a huge plus for me. I need something durable for outdoor adventures and this makes it a clear winner in terms of ruggedness.
See more
Release Year
What is the release year?
71
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
2023
60
Anker 737
0Votes
2022
vs
Release Year
The SHARGE Shargeek 170 was released in 2023, making it a newer model compared to the Anker 737 which was released in 2022, potentially offering more recent tech.
Indicates the year the product was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
Where is this product made?
36
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
China
35
Anker 737
0Votes
China
States the country where the product is manufactured or assembled.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What color options are available?
59
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Transparent
71
Anker 737
0Votes
Black
vs
Color Options
SHARGE Shargeek 170 comes in a Transparent color option, while Anker 737 is available in Black, appealing to different aesthetic preferences.
Lists the available exterior color choices.
In the battle of Color Options,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Rugged Design
Does it have a rugged design?
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Rugged Design
SHARGE Shargeek 170 boasts a rugged design for enhanced durability, a feature for which information is unavailable for Anker 737, suggesting the Shargeek might be more suited for rough conditions.
Indicates whether the power bank is built for enhanced durability.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rugged Design on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Dustproof Rating
What is the dustproof rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates protection against dust ingress.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dustproof Rating on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
36
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
32-113°F
35
Anker 737
0Votes
32-113°F
Specifies safe temperature conditions for storing the power bank when not in use.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Range,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Prevents battery depletion below safe voltage levels.
In the battle of Overdischarge Protection,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overdischarge Protection on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
24,000
mAh
0Votes
24,000
mAh
0Votes
Anker 737
With a substantial battery capacity of 24000 mAh, this power bank can fully charge multiple smartphones or even a laptop.
States the total energy storage capacity of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Capacity,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
equal
24,000.00 mAh
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Rating
What is the energy rating?
86.4
Watt
0Votes
86.4
Watt
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
The energy rating is 86.4 Wh, equivalent to 86.4 Watt-hours. This falls within airline carry-on limits (typically 100 Wh) without special approval, making it safe for air travel.
Measures total energy stored expressed in watt-hours.
In the battle of Energy Rating,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
equal
86.40 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Rating on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Voltage
What is the battery voltage?
22.2
Volt
0Votes
3.6
Volt
0Votes
vs
Battery Voltage
SHARGE Shargeek 170 features a higher battery voltage of 22.2 Volt, contrasting with Anker 737's 3.6 Volt, which could impact internal power management and efficiency.
Indicates the nominal voltage of the battery pack.
In the battle of Battery Voltage,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
18.6 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Voltage on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Cycle Life Rating
What is the cycle life rating?
46
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
500–800 Cycles
25
Anker 737
0Votes
300–500 Cycles
vs
Cycle Life Rating
SHARGE Shargeek 170 offers a superior cycle life rating of 500–800 cycles, outperforming Anker 737's 300–500 cycles, suggesting better long-term battery durability for the Shargeek.
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
In the battle of Cycle Life Rating,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
21 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cycle Life Rating on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Self-Discharge Rate
What is the self-discharge rate?
3
%
0Votes
2
%
0Votes
vs
Self-Discharge Rate
Anker 737 has a slightly lower self-discharge rate of 2% compared to SHARGE Shargeek 170's 3%, meaning the Anker retains its charge longer when not in use.
Indicates how much charge is lost when not in use.
In the battle of Self-Discharge Rate,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Self-Discharge Rate on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Protection System
Does it include a battery protection system?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
SHARGE Shargeek 170
A battery protection system is yes, integrating various safety features to ensure the longevity and safe operation of the battery.
Confirms presence of integrated battery protection circuitry.
In the battle of Battery Protection System,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Protection System on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Chemistry
What battery chemistry is used?
66
SHARGE Shargeek 170
1Votes
Lithium-Ion
55
Anker 737
0Votes
Lithium-Polymer
vs
Battery Chemistry
SHARGE Shargeek 170 uses Lithium-Ion battery chemistry, while Anker 737 uses Lithium-Polymer, which can affect performance characteristics like energy density and form factor.
Defines the chemical composition of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Chemistry,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Battery Chemistry,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 737 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
I prefer the Lithium-Ion battery chemistry in the SHARGE Shargeek 170. It generally provides good performance and is a reliable choice for a high-power device like this power bank.
See more
Rated Capacity
What is the rated capacity?
13,200
mAh
0Votes
24,000
mAh
0Votes
vs
Rated Capacity
The Anker 737 has a significantly higher rated capacity of 24000 mAh compared to the SHARGE Shargeek 170's 13200 mAh, meaning the Anker can deliver more usable power before needing a recharge.
Indicates the usable output capacity after conversion losses.
In the battle of Rated Capacity,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
10,800.0 mAh
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rated Capacity on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Cell Count
How many battery cells are used?
42
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
6
41
Anker 737
0Votes
6
Shows the number of battery cells inside the power bank.
In the battle of Cell Count,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cell Count on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Configuration
What is the battery configuration?
76
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Series Configuration
75
Anker 737
0Votes
Series Configuration
Describes how battery cells are electrically arranged to achieve desired voltage and capacity.
In the battle of Battery Configuration,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Configuration on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Loss
How much power is lost in standby?
1.5
Watt
0Votes
0.36
Watt
0Votes
vs
Standby Power Loss
The Anker 737 boasts a much lower standby power loss of 0.36 Watt compared to the SHARGE Shargeek 170's 1.5 Watt, indicating greater efficiency when idle for the Anker.
Measures power lost while the unit is idle.
In the battle of Standby Power Loss,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1.1 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Loss on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Overcharge Protection
Is overcharge protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Prevents damage from charging beyond safe limits.
In the battle of Overcharge Protection,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcharge Protection on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Estimates total time required to fully recharge the power bank.
In the battle of Charging Time,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
equal
1.50 hour
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Time on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Port Type
What input port types are supported?
71
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
USB-A, USB-C
85
Anker 737
0Votes
USB-C
vs
Input Port Type
SHARGE Shargeek 170 supports both USB-A and USB-C for input, while Anker 737 exclusively uses USB-C, giving the Shargeek more versatility for charging cables.
Identifies the physical port types used to recharge the power bank.
In the battle of Input Port Type,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
14 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Port Type on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Input Charging
Does it support fast input charging?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Fast input charging is yes, allowing the power bank itself to be recharged quickly.
Indicates whether fast-charging input standards are supported.
In the battle of Fast Input Charging,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fast Input Charging on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
USB-C Input
Is USB-C input supported?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Anker 737
The power bank supports USB-C input, enabling faster and more versatile charging for the power bank itself.
Confirms whether USB-C can be used as a charging input.
In the battle of USB-C Input,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-C Input on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Efficiency
What is the charging efficiency?
90
%
0Votes
87
%
0Votes
vs
Charging Efficiency
SHARGE Shargeek 170 boasts a slightly higher charging efficiency of 90% compared to Anker 737's 87%, meaning less energy is wasted as heat during charging for the Shargeek.
Measures how efficiently input power is converted to stored energy.
In the battle of Charging Efficiency,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
3.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Efficiency on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Input Power
What is the maximum input power?
140
Watt
0Votes
140
Watt
0Votes
Shows the maximum power the power bank can accept while charging.
In the battle of Maximum Input Power,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
equal
140.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Input Power on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage Range
What input voltage range is supported?
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
85
Anker 737
0Votes
5–28V
vs
Input Voltage Range
Anker 737 specifies an input voltage range of 5–28V, while this information is unavailable for SHARGE Shargeek 170, which might be important for users with specific power adapters.
Specifies the supported voltage range for charging input.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage Range on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Current Rating
What is the input current rating?
3
Amp
0Votes
5
Amp
0Votes
vs
Input Current Rating
Anker 737 has a higher input current rating of 5 Amp compared to SHARGE Shargeek 170's 3 Amp, potentially allowing the Anker to charge itself faster under optimal conditions.
Defines the maximum current the power bank can draw during charging.
In the battle of Input Current Rating,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.0 Amp
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current Rating on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Allows the power bank to charge devices while being charged itself.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
The SHARGE Shargeek 170 provides a higher total output power of 170 Watt, significantly more than the Anker 737's 140 Watt, making the Shargeek better suited for simultaneously charging multiple high-power devices.
Measures the combined power available when using multiple ports.
In the battle of Total Output Power,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
30.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Total Output Power,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 737 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The Shargeek 170 clearly wins on total output power, delivering a higher wattage. This means it can charge my laptop faster and handle more demanding devices easily.
Ensures balanced power delivery across connected devices.
In the battle of Power Distribution Control,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Control on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
The SHARGE Shargeek 170 offers 'Very Stable' output stability, a higher rating than the Anker 737's 'Stable' output, which suggests potentially more consistent power delivery from the Shargeek.
Describes how consistently the power bank maintains output power under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Output Stability,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
31 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Stability on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatically detects connected devices to optimize power output.
In the battle of Load Detection,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Detection on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Output Power
What is the maximum output power?
140
Watt
0Votes
140
Watt
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
It provides a maximum output power of 140 Watt, capable of rapidly charging high-power devices like laptops.
Anker 737
The power bank delivers a maximum output power of 140 Watt, capable of fast-charging demanding devices like laptops.
Shows the highest power level supported by a single output.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
equal
140.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Output Power on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current Rating
What is the output current rating?
170
Watt
0Votes
5
Watt
0Votes
vs
Output Current Rating
SHARGE Shargeek 170 lists its output current rating as 170 Watt, while Anker 737 has an output current rating of 5 Amp, indicating different ways of measuring output capabilities.
Represents the power delivery capability under load conditions.
In the battle of Output Current Rating,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
165.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current Rating on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Charging Technology
Which fast charging technologies are supported?
51
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Power Delivery, Quick Charge, PPS
50
Anker 737
0Votes
Power Delivery, PPS
vs
Fast Charging Technology
SHARGE Shargeek 170 supports Power Delivery, Quick Charge, and PPS fast charging technologies, while Anker 737 supports Power Delivery and PPS, giving the Shargeek broader compatibility with Quick Charge-enabled devices.
Lists supported fast-charging standards.
In the battle of Fast Charging Technology,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fast Charging Technology on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
Can it charge multiple devices simultaneously?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Anker 737
This power bank allows for simultaneous charging of multiple devices, increasing convenience and efficiency.
Indicates whether multiple devices can be charged at once.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Port Type
What output port types are available?
66
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
USB-A, USB-C
65
Anker 737
0Votes
USB-C, USB-A
Identifies the physical ports used to deliver power to devices.
In the battle of Output Port Type,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Port Type on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Voltage Range
What output voltage range is supported?
76
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
5–20V
85
Anker 737
0Votes
5–28V
vs
Output Voltage Range
Anker 737 offers a wider output voltage range of 5–28V compared to SHARGE Shargeek 170's 5–20V, which might provide more compatibility with various devices requiring different voltage inputs.
Defines the voltage levels supported for device charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage Range,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage Range on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation Accuracy
How accurate is the voltage regulation?
76
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Excellent
45
Anker 737
0Votes
Good
vs
Voltage Regulation Accuracy
SHARGE Shargeek 170 provides 'Excellent' voltage regulation accuracy, surpassing Anker 737's 'Good' rating, ensuring more precise voltage output for sensitive devices with the Shargeek.
Indicates how precisely the power bank maintains target voltage levels during charging.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation Accuracy,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
31 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation Accuracy on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Power Device Mode
Is there a low-power device mode?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Enables safe charging for small electronics like earbuds.
In the battle of Low-Power Device Mode,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Power Device Mode on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it auto shut off when idle?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Automatically stops output when no device is connected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
The power bank functions as a programmable power supply, allowing for dynamic voltage and current adjustments to optimize charging for different devices.
Indicates support for Programmable Power Supply charging.
In the battle of Programmable Power Supply,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Power Supply on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates ability to charge laptops via USB-C output.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Laptop Charging on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
SHARGE Shargeek 170
USB Power Delivery (PD) is yes, enabling high-speed charging for compatible devices, including laptops.
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery fast charging standard.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Is Quick Charge supported?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Quick Charge technology is yes, enabling faster charging for compatible devices.
Confirms compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge standards.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Anker 737
The power bank is compatible with Apple devices, ensuring efficient and safe charging for iPhones, iPads, and other Apple products.
Ensures optimized charging for Apple devices.
In the battle of Apple Charging Compatibility,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging Compatibility on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Current Device
Does it support low-current devices?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Low-current device charging mode is yes, optimized for safely charging smaller devices like earbuds or smartwatches.
Enables safe charging for devices requiring very low current.
In the battle of Low-Current Device,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Current Device on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Backward Compatibility
Is it backward compatible?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Backward compatibility is yes, ensuring the power bank can still charge older devices, even if they don't support the latest charging standards.
Ensures support for older devices and standards.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Samsung Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Samsung devices?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Confirms optimized charging for Samsung devices.
In the battle of Samsung Charging Compatibility,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Samsung Charging Compatibility on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Tablet Charging
Can it charge tablets?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Confirms reliable charging for tablets and large devices.
In the battle of Tablet Charging,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tablet Charging on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Device
Does it support wearable devices?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Indicates compatibility with smartwatches and wearables.
In the battle of Wearable Device,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Device on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Multi-Protocol,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Protocol on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Protocol Auto-Detection
Does it auto-detect charging protocols?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Automatically selects the best protocol for each device.
In the battle of Protocol Auto-Detection,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protocol Auto-Detection on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
The SHARGE Shargeek 170 has a width of 164.9 inches, which is significantly wider than the Anker 737's width of 6.13 inches, making the Anker much more compact.
Measures the horizontal size of the power bank.
In the battle of Width,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
158.8 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Height
What is the height?
59.6
inch
0Votes
1.95
inch
0Votes
vs
Height
The SHARGE Shargeek 170 measures 59.6 inches in height, significantly taller than the Anker 737's height of 1.95 inches, emphasizing the Anker's more portable form factor.
Measures the vertical dimension of the power bank.
In the battle of Height,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
57.7 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth?
62.8
inch
0Votes
2.15
inch
0Votes
vs
Depth
SHARGE Shargeek 170 has a depth of 62.8 inches, substantially larger than the Anker 737's depth of 2.15 inches, making the Anker a considerably slimmer device.
Measures the front-to-back thickness of the power bank.
In the battle of Depth,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
60.7 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Pocket-Friendly Design
Is it pocket-friendly?
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates whether the size is suitable for pocket carry.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pocket-Friendly Design on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Travel-Friendly Size
Is it travel-friendly?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Indicates suitability for travel and carry-on use.
In the battle of Travel-Friendly Size,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel-Friendly Size on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Drop Resistance Height
The SHARGE Shargeek 170 specifies a drop resistance height of 3 ft, providing a clear durability metric, whereas this information is not available for Anker 737.
Specifies the maximum drop height the device can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance Height on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Impact Resistance Rating
What is the impact resistance rating?
96
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
High Impact Resistance
0
Anker 737
0Votes
Low Impact Resistance
vs
Impact Resistance Rating
SHARGE Shargeek 170 boasts a High Impact Resistance rating, superior to Anker 737's Low Impact Resistance rating, suggesting the Shargeek is built to withstand more severe impacts.
Indicates the ability of the power bank to withstand shocks and physical impacts.
In the battle of Impact Resistance Rating,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
96 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Impact Resistance Rating on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Outer Shell Material
What is the outer shell material?
36
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Plastic
40
Anker 737
0Votes
Plastic, Rubberized
vs
Outer Shell Material
SHARGE Shargeek 170 features an outer shell made of Plastic, while Anker 737 uses a combination of Plastic and Rubberized materials, potentially offering better grip and a different feel for the Anker.
Specifies the primary material used for the exterior housing.
In the battle of Outer Shell Material,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Outer Shell Material on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Frame Material
What is the internal frame material?
31
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Metal, Plastic
30
Anker 737
0Votes
Plastic, Metal
Describes the internal structural material supporting the battery cells.
In the battle of Internal Frame Material,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Frame Material on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance
Is the power bank heat resistant?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Indicates whether the power bank is designed to withstand elevated internal and external temperatures without performance degradation.
In the battle of Heat Resistance,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Retardant Materials
Does it use fire-retardant materials?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Indicates use of flame-resistant materials in construction.
In the battle of Fire Retardant Materials,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Retardant Materials on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch Resistance
Is the surface scratch resistant?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
No
0Votes
Anker 737
Indicates whether the exterior surface is resistant to scratches from daily handling and transport.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Scratch Resistance on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Structural Reinforcement
Is there structural reinforcement?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
No
0Votes
Anker 737
vs
Structural Reinforcement
SHARGE Shargeek 170 includes structural reinforcement, a feature not specified for the Anker 737, suggesting the Shargeek may offer enhanced internal rigidity.
Indicates added reinforcement for improved durability.
In the battle of Structural Reinforcement,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Structural Reinforcement on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Button Durability Rating
How durable are the buttons?
66
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Very Good
35
Anker 737
0Votes
Good
vs
Button Durability Rating
SHARGE Shargeek 170 has a 'Very Good' button durability rating, slightly better than Anker 737's 'Good' rating, suggesting longer-lasting buttons for the Shargeek.
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
In the battle of Button Durability Rating,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
31 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Durability Rating on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
No
0Votes
Anker 737
vs
Port Reinforcement
SHARGE Shargeek 170 features port reinforcement, a durability aspect for which information is unavailable for Anker 737, implying better protection for the Shargeek's crucial connection points.
Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Display, Indicators & Controls
10
Display Type
What type of display does it have?
56
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Digital Display
45
Anker 737
0Votes
LCD Screen
vs
Display Type
The SHARGE Shargeek 170 uses a Digital Display, while the Anker 737 is equipped with an LCD Screen, offering different visual styles for information display.
Specifies the type of display used to show power information.
In the battle of Display Type,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Display Type on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Button Type
What type of button does it use?
26
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Physical Button
25
Anker 737
0Votes
Physical Button
Anker 737
The power bank operates with a Physical Button, offering tactile feedback and reliable control.
Describes the type of button used for control.
In the battle of Button Type,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Type on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Alerts
What user alerts are available?
19
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
LED Light, Buzzer
58
Anker 737
0Votes
LED Light, App Notification
vs
User Feedback Alerts
SHARGE Shargeek 170 provides user feedback through LED Light and a Buzzer, whereas Anker 737 uses LED Light and App Notifications, offering different alert methods to the user.
Indicates how the device provides user feedback and alerts.
In the battle of User Feedback Alerts,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Alerts on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Level Indicator
Does it show battery level?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Indicates whether the power bank shows remaining battery level.
In the battle of Battery Level Indicator,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Level Indicator on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Accuracy
How accurate is the battery indicator?
95
%
0Votes
1
%
0Votes
vs
Indicator Accuracy
SHARGE Shargeek 170 offers an indicator accuracy of 95%, while Anker 737 states an indicator accuracy of 1%, representing a significant difference in how precisely battery levels are displayed.
Measures how accurately the indicator reflects actual remaining power.
In the battle of Indicator Accuracy,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
94.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Accuracy on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Remaining Time Display
Does it display remaining time?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Shows estimated remaining usage or charging time.
In the battle of Remaining Time Display,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remaining Time Display on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Button Count
How many buttons are there?
21
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
1
20
Anker 737
0Votes
1
Indicates the number of physical control buttons.
In the battle of Button Count,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Count on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Touch Control
Does it support touch controls?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
No
0Votes
Anker 737
vs
Touch Control
SHARGE Shargeek 170 incorporates touch control, a modern interface feature not specified for Anker 737, offering a potentially more intuitive user experience with the Shargeek.
Indicates whether touch-based controls are supported.
In the battle of Touch Control,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch Control on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Wake Feature
Does it auto wake when a device is connected?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Automatically activates when a device is connected.
In the battle of Auto Wake Feature,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Wake Feature on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Sleep Feature
Does it auto sleep when idle?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Automatically enters sleep mode when idle to save power.
In the battle of Auto Sleep Feature,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Sleep Feature on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Smart power management is yes, intelligently distributing power to optimize charging speed and efficiency across multiple devices.
Dynamically manages power to maintain safe operation.
In the battle of Smart Power Management,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Power Management on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates compliance with airline carry-on regulations.
In the battle of Airline Safety Compliance,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Airline Safety Compliance on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Anker 737
This power bank is equipped with overcurrent protection, which prevents damage to connected devices by limiting the current flow.
Protects devices from excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Short Circuit Protection
Does it have short circuit protection?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Prevents damage when a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it include overvoltage protection?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Prevents voltage levels from exceeding safe limits.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Foreign Object Detection
Does it detect foreign objects?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
No
0Votes
Anker 737
vs
Foreign Object Detection
SHARGE Shargeek 170 includes Foreign Object Detection, a safety feature that is not specified for Anker 737, providing an extra layer of protection for the Shargeek during charging.
Detects abnormal objects or unsafe connections.
In the battle of Foreign Object Detection,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foreign Object Detection on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Electrostatic Discharge Protection
Does it protect against static discharge?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Protects internal circuits from static electricity.
In the battle of Electrostatic Discharge Protection,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrostatic Discharge Protection on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification
What safety certifications does it have?
65
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
CE, FCC, RoHS
63
Anker 737
0Votes
CE, FCC, RoHS
Lists recognized safety and compliance certifications.
In the battle of Safety Certification,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Protection Circuit
Does it include fire protection circuitry?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Includes circuitry designed to prevent fire hazards.
In the battle of Fire Protection Circuit,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Protection Circuit on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Fail-Safe Shutdown
Does it have fail-safe shutdown?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Automatically shuts down under critical fault conditions.
In the battle of Fail-Safe Shutdown,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fail-Safe Shutdown on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Firmware
Is safety firmware implemented?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Uses firmware logic to manage and enforce safety rules.
In the battle of Safety Firmware,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Firmware on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
SHARGE Shargeek 170 utilizes a Heat Spreader Design for cooling, distinct from Anker 737's Enhanced Passive Cooling, indicating different engineering strategies for thermal management.
Describes the overall cooling architecture used to manage internal heat during charging and discharging.
In the battle of Cooling Design Type,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Design Type on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
The SHARGE Shargeek 170 is equipped with 4 thermal sensors, one more than the Anker 737's 3 thermal sensors, potentially allowing for more precise temperature monitoring in the Shargeek.
Specifies how many thermal sensors are used for temperature monitoring.
In the battle of Thermal Sensor Count,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Sensor Count on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Management System
Does it have a thermal management system?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
SHARGE Shargeek 170
A thermal management system is yes, actively regulating the device's temperature to ensure safe and efficient operation.
Indicates whether the power bank includes an integrated thermal management system.
In the battle of Thermal Management System,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Management System on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Cutoff Threshold
At what temperature does it shut down?
140
°F
0Votes
149
°F
0Votes
vs
Thermal Cutoff Threshold
Anker 737 has a higher thermal cutoff threshold of 149°F compared to SHARGE Shargeek 170's 140°F, indicating the Anker can operate at slightly warmer internal temperatures before shutting down for safety.
Indicates the temperature at which the system shuts down to prevent damage.
In the battle of Thermal Cutoff Threshold,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
9.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Cutoff Threshold on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Temperature Regulation
Is charging temperature regulated?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Anker 737
Charging temperature regulation is in place to prevent overheating during the charging cycle, protecting both the device and its battery.
Actively manages temperature during charging cycles.
In the battle of Charging Temperature Regulation,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Temperature Regulation on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Recovery Behavior
How does it recover from overheating?
66
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Automatic Resume
25
Anker 737
0Votes
Cooldown Required
vs
Overheat Recovery Behavior
SHARGE Shargeek 170 offers Automatic Resume after overheating, which is more convenient than Anker 737's requirement for a Cooldown, allowing the Shargeek to get back to charging without manual intervention.
Defines how the system recovers after an overheat shutdown.
In the battle of Overheat Recovery Behavior,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Recovery Behavior on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
16
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
Passive Cooling
25
Anker 737
0Votes
Passive Cooling, Metal Chassis
vs
Heat Dissipation Method
SHARGE Shargeek 170 uses Passive Cooling for heat dissipation, while Anker 737 employs Passive Cooling along with a Metal Chassis, suggesting the Anker might manage heat more effectively.
Describes how heat is dispersed away from internal components.
In the battle of Heat Dissipation Method,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Dissipation Method on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Heat Sink
Is there an internal heat sink?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Indicates the presence of an internal heat sink to absorb and spread heat.
In the battle of Internal Heat Sink,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Heat Sink on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Throttling
Does it support thermal throttling?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Reduces power output automatically to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Throttling on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Temperature Control
Is surface temperature controlled?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Limits external surface temperature for safe handling.
In the battle of Surface Temperature Control,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Temperature Control on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Discharge Temperature Regulation
Is discharge temperature regulated?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Controls temperature while powering external devices.
In the battle of Discharge Temperature Regulation,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Discharge Temperature Regulation on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 737 includes Bluetooth Connectivity, a feature not specified for SHARGE Shargeek 170, enabling smart app control and extended functionality for the Anker.
Indicates whether the power bank can connect wirelessly to other devices.
In the battle of Bluetooth Connectivity,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
.
Based on community votes for Bluetooth Connectivity,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 737 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Having Bluetooth connectivity and app support on the Anker 737 is a game-changer. I love being able to monitor my power bank from my phone and get smart alerts.
Anker 737 provides App Support, which is unavailable for SHARGE Shargeek 170, allowing Anker users to monitor and control their power bank via a smartphone application.
Confirms whether a companion mobile app is available.
In the battle of App Support,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App Support on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Provides real-time monitoring of power flow and usage.
In the battle of Smart Power Monitoring,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Power Monitoring on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Sends alerts for battery status, faults, or charging completion.
In the battle of Smart Alerts,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Alerts on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Firmware upgradability is yes, allowing the device's software to be updated for improved performance or new features.
Indicates whether firmware can be updated to improve functionality.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Device Usage Analytics
Does it provide usage analytics?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Tracks connected device charging behavior and patterns.
In the battle of Device Usage Analytics,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Usage Analytics on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging History Tracking
Is charging history tracked?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Records past charging sessions for review.
In the battle of Charging History Tracking,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging History Tracking on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Remote Status Monitoring
Can status be monitored remotely?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
vs
Remote Status Monitoring
Anker 737 supports Remote Status Monitoring, a capability not specified for SHARGE Shargeek 170, enabling users to check the power bank's status from a distance with the Anker.
Allows users to check power bank status remotely.
In the battle of Remote Status Monitoring,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Status Monitoring on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates manufacturer support for recycling or take-back programs.
In the battle of Recycling Program,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recycling Program on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Power Consumption
How much power is used while idle?
2
Watt
0Votes
0.1
Watt
1Votes
vs
Idle Power Consumption
Anker 737 has a significantly lower idle power consumption of 0.1 Watt compared to SHARGE Shargeek 170's 2 Watt, making the Anker more energy-efficient when not actively charging devices.
Indicates how much power is consumed when the power bank is not actively charging devices.
In the battle of Idle Power Consumption,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1.9 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Idle Power Consumption,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 737 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
I'm really impressed with the Anker 737's low idle power consumption. It means less wasted energy when not in use, which is great for overall efficiency.
See more
Energy Conversion Efficiency
What is the energy conversion efficiency?
78
%
0Votes
88
%
0Votes
vs
Energy Conversion Efficiency
Anker 737 demonstrates a higher energy conversion efficiency of 88% compared to SHARGE Shargeek 170's 78%, meaning the Anker wastes less energy during power transfer, making it more eco-friendly and effective.
Measures how efficiently stored energy is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Energy Conversion Efficiency,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
10.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Conversion Efficiency on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Eco Mode
Does it support eco mode?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
No
0Votes
Anker 737
vs
Eco Mode
SHARGE Shargeek 170 features an Eco Mode, a power-saving option not specified for Anker 737, which can help extend battery life when charging low-power devices.
Enables reduced power usage to improve efficiency and battery longevity.
In the battle of Eco Mode,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco Mode on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Power Optimization
Does it optimize power automatically?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Automatically adjusts output to reduce energy waste.
In the battle of Automatic Power Optimization,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Power Optimization on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Sustainable Materials
Does it use sustainable materials?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
No
0Votes
Anker 737
Indicates use of environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Sustainable Materials,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustainable Materials on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Certification
What environmental certifications does it have?
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Lists recognized environmental or sustainability certifications.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Certification on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates whether a protective carrying case is included.
In the battle of Carrying Case,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carrying Case on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
240
ft
0Votes
2
ft
0Votes
Specifies the length of the included charging cable.
In the battle of Cable Length,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
238.0 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Wall Adapter
Is a wall adapter included?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
No
0Votes
Anker 737
vs
Wall Adapter
SHARGE Shargeek 170 includes a wall adapter, which is not provided with the Anker 737, meaning the Shargeek comes with a complete charging solution out of the box.
Indicates whether a wall charging adapter is provided.
In the battle of Wall Adapter,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wall Adapter on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Adapter Power Rating
What is the adapter power rating?
170
Watt
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the power output of the included wall adapter.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapter Power Rating on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
User Manual
Is a user manual included?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Indicates whether a user manual or guide is provided.
In the battle of User Manual,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Manual on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
4.5
inch
0Votes
Measures the width of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
2.5
inch
0Votes
Measures the depth of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
7.5
inch
0Votes
Measures the height of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
The 24-month warranty on the Anker 737 gives me much more peace of mind. It shows confidence in their product quality and offers longer support for any potential issues.
See more
Technical Support Availability
Is technical support available?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Anker 737
Technical support is available to assist users with any product-related queries or issues.
Confirms access to technical support services.
In the battle of Technical Support Availability,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Technical Support Availability on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Support Channels
What support channels are available?
36
SHARGE Shargeek 170
0Votes
E-mail
53
Anker 737
0Votes
Email, Phone, Live Chat, App Support
Anker 737
Multiple support channels are available, including Email, Phone, Live Chat, and App Support, to provide comprehensive customer assistance.
Lists available customer support contact methods.
In the battle of Support Channels,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Support Duration
How long is firmware support provided?
3
years
0Votes
3
years
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
The firmware support duration is 3 years, indicating that software updates and maintenance will be provided for this period.
Indicates how long the manufacturer provides firmware updates and software support.
In the battle of Firmware Support Duration,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
equal
3.00 years
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Support Duration on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Warranty Coverage
Is the battery covered by warranty?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Indicates whether the battery itself is covered under warranty.
In the battle of Battery Warranty Coverage,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Warranty Coverage on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Policy
Is there a replacement policy?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Indicates eligibility for replacement in case of defects.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Repair Service Availability
Are repair services available?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Shargeek 170
No
0Votes
Anker 737
Confirms whether repair services are offered.
In the battle of Repair Service Availability,
SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Repair Service Availability on SHARGE Shargeek 170 ◉
vs Anker 737 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed Performance
How fast does this power bank recharge devices in everyday use?
Ultra fast charging — Under 1.5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1.5 to 3 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate charging — 3 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 5 to 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Capacity Satisfaction
How satisfied are you with the battery capacity of this power bank for daily needs?
Massive capacity for multiple days — Over 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Very high capacity — 20000 to 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Solid everyday capacity — 10000 to 19999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Limited capacity — 5000 to 9999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Barely useful capacity — Under 5000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Output Power and Device Support
How well does this power bank handle charging different devices at once?
Handles everything with ease — 100 W or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong multi device support — 60 to 99 W
0Votes
0Votes
Good for phones and tablets — 30 to 59 W
0Votes
0Votes
Basic output only — 15 to 29 W
0Votes
0Votes
Struggles with most devices — Under 15 W
0Votes
0Votes
Port Selection and Flexibility
How flexible is this power bank when it comes to charging ports?
Covers all modern needs — USB C and USB A with fast charge
0Votes
0Votes
Very versatile — Multiple USB C and USB A ports
0Votes
0Votes
Good variety — USB C and USB A basic support
0Votes
0Votes
Limited options — Single USB C or USB A port
0Votes
0Votes
Very restrictive — One slow USB port only
0Votes
0Votes
Size and Portability
How easy is this power bank to carry around daily?
Pocket friendly and lightweight — Under 8 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Easy to carry — 8 to 12 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Manageable but noticeable — 12 to 18 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Bulky for daily carry — 18 to 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Too heavy to carry around — Over 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Build Quality and Durability
How durable does this power bank feel during regular use?
Feels extremely solid and long lasting — Over 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Very durable — 3 to 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Decent build quality — 2 to 3 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Feels fragile — 1 to 2 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap and unreliable — Under 1 year expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging output from this power bank during use?
Rock solid with no drops — Voltage variation under 3 percent
0Votes
0Votes
Very stable — 3 to 5 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Mostly stable — 5 to 8 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Occasional drops — 8 to 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Unstable charging — Over 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Heat and Safety Performance
How well does this power bank control heat during charging and heavy use?
Stays cool and safe — Under 95 F
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly warm but comfortable — 95 to 104 F
0Votes
0Votes
Warm but acceptable — 104 to 113 F
0Votes
0Votes
Gets quite hot — 113 to 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot and concerning — Over 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Efficiency
How efficiently does this power bank convert stored energy into usable charging power?
Highly efficient with minimal loss — Over 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Very efficient — 85 to 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Decent efficiency — 75 to 84 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeable energy loss — 65 to 74 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Poor efficiency — Under 65 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Travel Friendliness
How convenient is this power bank for travel and daily commuting?
Perfect for travel and flights — No airline issues
0Votes
0Votes
Very travel friendly — Easy to pack and carry
0Votes
0Votes
Fine for occasional travel — Manageable size and weight
0Votes
0Votes
Awkward to carry on trips — Bulky or heavy
0Votes
0Votes
Not suitable for travel — Restricted or impractical
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
